Universities should use the results creatively to help them ask tough questions about what they do. An impressive institutions submitted for Tef assessment, including large multi-faculty universities and specialist institutions, research-intensive and teaching-intensive universities, further education colleges offering higher education and alternative providers. The outcomes draw together the results of an assessment of teaching excellence across all these types of institution based on evaluation of a set of statistical metrics, benchmarked for institution type and student mix, alongside an institutional submission of approximately 10, words.
But I am also aware that students, who are now investing significant sums of money and personal risk in their higher education, are interested in precisely the things the Tef measures: how likely are they to secure a highly skilled job? How successful are universities and colleges at retaining students?
Understanding Teaching Excellence in Higher Education: Towards a Critical Approach
How effective do students at each institution think the assessment and feedback is? How successful are universities and colleges with students from different backgrounds and ethnic groups? These are valid questions, and we have the data to answer them — not crudely, but carefully benchmarked. There are others who accept the principle of assessing teaching performance but argue that the chosen metrics are inadequate proxies for what really matters. As a social scientist, I know that almost all social statistics are flawed and that all need careful analysis.
The challenge for those who argue that the Tef uses the wrong metrics is to offer sensible alternatives to the national student survey NSS and the analysis of graduate destinations. To date, critics have not been able to suggest any. When I talk to fellow vice-chancellors about the NSS — itself established for over a decade — they are pretty clear that it provides them with a useful tool for addressing areas that require improvement. So what does the Tef tell us?
Alongside the recently published Longitudinal Education Outcomes data on salaries and employment and the pilot studies of learning gain at university, it is part of an increased focus on outcomes for students.
- Universities, don't rest on your laurels – use the Tef to improve | Education | The Guardian!
- Clinical Guidelines in Urological Management!
- Site links;
- Inclusive learning and teaching in Higher Education | Advance HE!
In the past, universities have thought more about inputs such as staff and technology , processes such as curriculum and assessment and outputs such as degree classifications. The focus on outcomes is a potential game changer which needs to shape the way universities think. Not because outcomes are all that matter, but because, in a mass higher education system, they do matter.
At the core of Tef is a strategic clarity about outcomes: it directs attention to a critical relationship between institutional policies — the arrangements autonomous universities make for students, institutional practices which are not the same as policies and student outcomes. It requires universities to think hard about the impact of what they do and how they evaluate it. Institutions that did best, wherever they are in the sector, grasped this with coherent and compelling ways to describe that relationship.
The very best submissions were simply a joy to read, conveying a rich, vibrant learning experience which, among other things, engaged and stretched students, extending their sense of what is possible and orienting them to success beyond university or college. This success was distributed across the sector — it is independent of institutional reputation, age, subject makeup or regional location. The Tef panel was required — rightly — by the published specification to focus on the way higher education meets the needs of the most disadvantaged.
Fieldwork for Human Geography. Jennifer Johns. Globalization and Internationalization in Higher Education. Dr Felix Maringe. Reconceptualising Lifelong Learning. Sue Jackson. The Knowledge Business. Rob Imrie. Reconstructing Restorative Justice Philosophy. Theo Gavrielides. Controversies in Management.
Alan B Thomas. Managing Complex Networks. Dr Walter J M Kickert. New Technology Work. Paul Boreham.
Andrew Josey. Staff Development in Open and Flexible Education. Colin Latchem. Governing Security. Clifford D. Fundamentals of contract and commercial management. Jane Chittenden.
- Selling 101: What Every Successful Sales Professional Needs to Know;
- People also read.
- The Nazi Germany Sourcebook: An Anthology of Texts.
- Process Engineering Equipment Handbook!
- Main navigation;
- What Is Teaching Excellence?.
Yvonne Jewkes. Theorising the Practice of Community Development. Peter Westoby.
The challenges of assessing teaching excellence: Universities will game the system
A Liberal Vocationalism. John Brennan. Outstanding Differentiation for Learning in the Classroom. Jayne Bartlett. Nathan Emmerich. Teaching Politics and International Relations. Danusia Malina. Challenging the 'European Area of Lifelong Learning'. Maria N.
Redesigning Accountability Systems for Education. Susan H. Lifelong Learning. Next Practices. Darryl Vidal. Interdisciplinary Learning and Teaching in Higher Education. Balasubramanyam Chandramohan. Tracey Maciver. Universities and Corporate Universities. Peter Jarvis.
Teachers' Work in a Globalizing Economy. Alistair Dow. Literature in Language Education. Geoff Hall. Mathematical Modelling in Education Research and Practice. Gloria Ann Stillman. Organizing Academic Work in Higher Education.
Uwe Wilkesmann. Chemistry Education and Sustainability in the Global Age. Mei-Hung Chiu. Developing Professional Practice Andy Armitage. Reshaping Doctoral Education. Alison Lee. Paul Barron.
Teaching Journals Directory | Page 8 | Center for Excellence in Teaching and Learning - CETL
Managing Fragmentation. Adrian Barton. Social Justice, Transformation and Knowledge. James Avis. The Classroom. Leave Your Attitude at the Door. Amy Thompson. Ethics Across the Curriculum—Pedagogical Perspectives.
Related UNDERSTANDING TEACHING EXCELLENCE IN HIGHER EDUCATION (Key Issues in Higher Education)
Copyright 2019 - All Right Reserved